Ethical hacking engagements that simulate real-world attacks to identify and remediate vulnerabilities before they're exploited.
Service pathway
Authorized web, API, mobile, network, wireless, cloud, physical, and social-engineering testing to identify exploitable weaknesses and verify remediation.
We agree written authorization, objectives, assets, environments, test windows, rules of engagement, safety boundaries, and escalation contacts before testing. Testing combines reconnaissance, manual analysis, carefully controlled exploitation, evidence capture, reporting, and retesting.
Manual and tool-assisted testing against the OWASP Top 10 and beyond, including injection, broken access control, authentication flaws, and business-logic abuse.
Confirm scope and rules → map the application → combine manual exploitation attempts with advanced tooling → document findings, evidence, risk, and remediation guidance.
Web applications are a primary exposed attack surface, and meaningful assessment goes beyond automated scanning.
Testing RESTful and GraphQL APIs for broken object-level authorization, excessive data exposure, rate-limit weaknesses, and authentication flaws.
Inventory endpoints → review documentation → enumerate routes → test authorization boundaries and object references → assess data exposure and abuse cases.
APIs often carry the sensitive data displayed by frontends, while authorization flaws can evade conventional scanners.
Assessment of iOS and Android applications for client-side, transport, and backend risks such as insecure storage and weak transport security.
Perform static and dynamic analysis → review local storage → test transport security → assess backend services and API behavior.
Mobile packages run on untrusted devices, exposing secrets, storage, transport, and server-side assumptions to determined attackers.
Simulated internal and external network attacks plus wireless assessment of access points, encryption, rogue access points, and segmentation.
Test the external perimeter → simulate internal lateral movement → assess wireless configuration → validate segmentation and escalation boundaries.
A single foothold can become a broad compromise when segmentation, wireless, or internal controls are weak.
Authorized testing of physical access and human factors, including tailgating, badge controls, pretexting, and defined phishing scenarios.
Agree objectives and boundaries → perform controlled on-site attempts → run approved social-engineering scenarios → debrief findings and awareness recommendations.
Human and physical weaknesses can bypass strong technical controls and should be assessed within safe, written rules of engagement.
Static or dynamic code testing for exploitable defects plus post-remediation retesting that verifies fixes.
Select white-box, gray-box, or black-box objectives → prioritize findings by risk → provide evidence and remediation guidance → retest changed components and document outcomes.
Scans indicate what might be exploitable; penetration testing demonstrates what is exploitable, and retesting proves whether remediation closed the path.
A practical next step
Share the standard, scope, and outcome you are working toward.
Start a conversationQuestions to resolve
Scanning identifies potential weaknesses at scale. Penetration testing uses manual analysis and controlled exploitation to determine whether weaknesses are practically exploitable and what impact they create.
Related routes
Start here
Share the standard, regulation, or customer requirement you are working toward. We will map a proportionate next step.
